Agreement between parent-report and EMR height, weight, and BMI among rural children

Introduction Remote anthropometric surveillance has emerged as a strategy to accommodate lapses in growth monitoring for pediatricians during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The purpose of this investigation was to validate parent-reported anthropometry and inform acceptable remote measurement practices among rural, preschool-aged children. Methods Parent-reported height, weight, body mass index (BMI), BMI z-score, and BMI percentile for their child were collected through surveys with the assessment of their source of home measure. Objective measures were collected by clinic staff at the child’s well-child visit (WCV). Agreement was assessed using correlations, alongside an exploration of the time gap (TG) between parent-report and WCV to moderate agreement. Using parent- and objectively reported BMI z-scores, weight classification agreement was evaluated. Correction equations were applied to parent-reported anthropometrics. Results A total of 55 subjects were included in this study. Significant differences were observed between parent- and objectively reported weight in the overall group (−0.24 kg; p = 0.05), as well as height (−1.8 cm; p = 0.01) and BMI (0.4 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.02) in the ≤7d TG + Direct group. Parental reporting of child anthropometry ≤7d from their WCV with direct measurements yielded the strongest correlations r = 0.99 (weight), r = 0.95 (height), r = 0.82 (BMI), r = 0.71 (BMIz), and r = 0.68 (BMI percentile) and greatest classification agreement among all metrics 91.67% (weight), 54.17% (height), 83.33% (BMI), 91.67% (BMIz), and 33.33% (BMI percentile). Corrections did not remarkably improve correlations. Discussion Remote pediatric anthropometry is a valid supplement for clinical assessment, conditional on direct measurement within 7 days. In rural populations where socioenvironmental barriers exist to care and surveillance, we highlight the utility of telemedicine for providers and researchers.