Analysis reveals overall survival differences in chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment sequences, suggesting further evaluation is needed.
Background/Objectives: This study compared overall survival (OS) associated with common real-world treatment sequences in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) in the United States. Methods: Utilizing the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database, adult CLL/SLL patients who initiated systemic therapy (JAN2016-NOV2023) and received at least two lines of therapy (LoTs) were analyzed. Treatment regimens were categorized based on drug class, and most frequent (n ≥ 50) sequences (first LoT followed by [→] second LoT) were compared. OS from initiation of the first LoT was compared using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% CIs were reported. Results: Among 2354 eligible patients, n = 1711 (73%) received the 16 most frequent treatment sequences. Sequencing chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) → CIT (HR: 2.29 [1.23–4.28]), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (anti-CD20mab) monotherapy → CIT (1.95 [1.03–3.69]), and covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) monotherapy → anti-CD20mab monotherapy (2.00 [1.07–3.74]) were associated with worse OS compared to patients treated with cBTKi monotherapy → B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors (BCL2i) + anti-CD20mab (reference). Conclusions: OS associated with other sequences were not significantly different from the reference sequence in adjusted analyses, suggesting a lack of evidence for the optimal standard of care for sequencing the first two LoTs in real-world settings. Future research should reassess sequencing outcomes as novel treatments become adopted into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhodes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: