Latent profile analysis reveals four well-being profiles among secondary students, indicating that classroom relationships significantly influence transitions.
Background Classroom relationships are known to be one of the most important yet complex predictors of student well-being. However, this complexity is frequently not considered, and it remains unclear whether students with different well-being profiles and their transitions are impacted differently by teacher-student and student–student relationships. Objective This study aims to examine secondary school students’ well-being profiles, their transitions over time, and their connection to teacher-student and student–student relationships. Methods Participants included 757 Swiss secondary school students from grade 7 (47.8% female; M age = 13.12, SD age =.60) to grade 8 (44.6% female; M age = 13.92, SD age =.81). Latent profile analysis was conducted to classify students based on a multidimensional construct of student well-being, encompassing positive and negative emotions and cognitions toward school. To examine profile stability and transitions over time, latent transition analysis was used, and relationships with teacher-student closeness and conflict as well as student–student cohesion were analyzed. Results Four well-being profiles emerged: flourishing, perfectionist, worried, and ambivalent. Profiles varied in the composition of well-being dimensions, with school worries prevalent across all profiles. Students with high positive emotions transitioned to profiles with lower well-being, while those with high negative emotions remained in less favorable profiles. Teacher-student closeness and student–student cohesion supported favorable transitions, whereas teacher-student conflict hindered positive changes. Conclusions The identification of four distinct well-being profiles highlights individual differences in well-being and the interplay of positive and negative emotions. Teachers may play a pivotal role in preventing transitions to less favorable profiles, emphasizing the importance of fostering supportive classroom relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saxer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: