Randomized trial examines intervention effects on student well-being in schools, highlighting the significance of relationships and motivation.
Background Student well-being is a core educational goal and a foundation for successful learning, yet it tends to decline during secondary school. Many school-based interventions show promising but inconsistent effects on student well-being. Also, the role of individual and classroom factors in shaping effects remains unclear.Aims We examined (1) changes in student well-being across a 10-week intervention programme comparing three sets of well-being strategies with a placebo control and (2) whether baseline student-student relationships and intrinsic motivation to participate moderated student well-being trajectories.Sample A total of 685 Grade 8 students (51% male; t1: Mage = 14 years, SD = 0.6) from 44 classes across 17 schools in Switzerland participated in our study.Methods Classes were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions or a placebo control. Student-reported well-being (three positive, three negative dimensions), student-student relationships and intrinsic motivation were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention and an additional 8-month follow-up. We estimated repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models. Given a non-significant main condition effect, moderator analyses contrasted high versus low baseline relationships and motivation.Results Across student well-being dimensions, significant time effects were observed, but few condition or interaction effects were found. Student well-being declined over time, irrespective of condition. Students with stronger baseline student-student relationships and/or higher baseline intrinsic motivation reported higher scores on positive well-being dimensions.Conclusions Individual resources-student-student relationships and intrinsic motivation-were more strongly related to student well-being than participation in a specific condition. Interventions may need to deliberately strengthen such resources and tailor their components to student and classroom contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mori et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: