Reflections on the 2024 ESJP review process: Andreas

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The review process improved dialogue, encouraging openness in critique and understanding of arguments.
Participants noted that the traditional double-blind review creates suspicion rather than constructive feedback.
Using a developmental review approach, authors felt more valued and less defensive in addressing critiques.
The new method emphasized self-criticism, enhancing the quality of feminist work through collaborative dialogue.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Reflections highlight the importance of a dialogical review process in feminist work, suggesting improved critique experiences.

Andreas Ottemo (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark