Assessment reveals soil liquefaction probability using Monte Carlo simulation in seismic settings, highlighting key distributions.
One of the important tasks in sand liquefaction assessment is to evaluate the likelihood of soil liquefaction. However, most liquefaction assessment methods are deterministic for influencing factors and fail to calculate the liquefaction probability by systematically considering the probability distributions of soil factors. Based on field liquefaction investigation cases, probability distribution fitting and a hypothesis test were carried out. For the variables that failed to pass the fitting and test, the kernel density estimation was conducted. Methods for calculating the liquefaction probability using a Monte Carlo simulation with the probability distribution were then proposed. The results indicated that for (N1)60, SM, S, and GM followed a Gaussian distribution, while CL and ML followed a lognormal distribution; for FC, SM and GM followed a lognormal distribution; and for d50, ML and S followed a Gaussian and lognormal distribution, respectively. The other factors’ distribution curves can be calculated by kernel density estimation. It is feasible to calculate the liquefaction probability based on a Monte Carlo simulation of the variable distribution. The result of the liquefaction probability calculation in this case was similar to that of the existing probability model and was consistent with actual observations. Regional sample differences were considered by introducing the normal distribution error term, and the liquefaction probability accuracy could be improved to a certain extent. The liquefaction probability at a specific seismic level or the total probability within a certain period in the future can be calculated with the method proposed in this paper. It provides a data-driven basis for realistically estimating the likelihood of soil liquefaction under seismic loading and contributes to site classification, liquefaction potential zoning, and ground improvements in seismic design decisions. The practical value of seismic hazard mapping and performance-based design in earthquake-prone regions was also demonstrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: