Research reveals internal conductive defects significantly alter electric field distribution and temperature rise in composite insulators, indicating a need for effective on-site diagnosis.
Internal conductive defects in composite insulators severely degrade their insulation performance and are considered concealed defects, posing a significant threat to the safe and stable operation of the power grid. Focusing on this issue, this study develops an electro-thermal multi-physical field simulation model and uses finite element analysis to investigate the electric field distribution and temperature rise characteristics. Composite insulator specimens with varying defect lengths were fabricated using the electrical erosion test. Charged tests were then conducted on these defective specimens, as well as on field-decommissioned specimens. The impact of internal conductive defects on the infrared, ultraviolet, and electric field distribution characteristics of composite insulators during operation was analyzed. The results indicate that the surface electric field of composite insulators with internal conductive defects becomes highly concentrated along the defect path, with a significant increase in electric field strength at the defect’s end. The maximum field strength migrates toward the grounded end as the defect length increases. Conductive defects lead to partial discharge and abnormal temperature rise at the defect’s end and the bending points of the composite insulator. The temperature rise predominantly manifests as “bar-form temperature rise,” with temperature rise regions correlating well with discharge areas. Conductive defects accelerate the decay-like degradation process of composite insulators through a positive feedback loop formed by the coupling of electric field distortion, Joule heating, material degradation, and discharge activity. This study identifies the key characteristics of electrical and temperature rise changes in insulators with conductive defects, reveals the deterioration evolution process and degradation mechanisms of insulators, and provides effective criteria for on-site diagnosis of conductive defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: