Screening reveals thyroid nodules in 14% of adults aged 50-65, suggesting further follow-up may often be necessary.
Introduction Incidental thyroid nodules (ITN) are common findings, but they cause a dilemma for both clinicians and radiologists. Should all nodules be mentioned in the radiology report and is a follow-up ultrasound always necessary? Method We prospectively performed a thyroid ultrasound screening of 542 randomly selected individuals, 50-65 years old, participating in the Swedish CardioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS). For those with thyroid nodules demanding further work-up (according to TIRADS), follow-up ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) was performed. Result In the screened cohort, 14% had thyroid nodules measuring ≥1 cm and 8% underwent FNA whereof six had Bethesda category III-VI and subsequently underwent surgery, with benign histopathology results in five patients and one case of follicular tumor of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMP). Discussion In conclusion, when screening an unselected Swedish cohort, 50-65 years of age, with thyroid ultrasound, we found ≥1 cm nodules in 14%. Thyroid malignancy was extremely rare but the amount of required follow-up is not negligible, even when applying TIRADS to discriminate which nodules must undergo FNA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlqvist et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: