This system demonstrates a low-cost timing solution with microsecond accuracy in IoT, highlighting advantages over traditional methods.
Precise time interval generation is a cornerstone of modern measurement, automation, and distributed control systems, particularly within Internet of Things (IoT) architectures. This paper presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of a low-cost and high-precision time interval generator based on Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) logic counters (Integrated Circuit (IC) IC 7493 and IC 4017) and inverter-based crystal oscillators (IC 74LS04). The proposed system enables frequency division from 1 MHz down to 1 Hz through a cascade of binary and Johnson counters, enhanced with digitally controlled multiplexers for output signal selection. Unlike conventional timing systems relying on expensive Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-based synchronization, this approach offers a robust, locally controlled reference clock suitable for IoT nodes without network access. The hardware is integrated with Arduino and ESP32 microcontrollers via General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) level interfacing, supporting real-time timestamping, deterministic task execution, and microsecond-level synchronization. The system was validated through Python-based simulations incorporating Gaussian jitter models, as well as real-time experimental measurements using Arduino’s micros() function. Results demonstrated stable pulse generation with timing deviations consistently below ±3 µs across various frequency modes. A comparative analysis confirms the advantages of this CMOS-based timing solution over Real-Time Clock (RTC), Network Time Protocol (NTP), and Global Positioning System (GPS)-based methods in terms of local autonomy, cost, and integration simplicity. This work provides a practical and scalable time reference architecture for educational, industrial, and distributed applications, establishing a new bridge between classical digital circuit design and modern Internet of Things (IoT) timing requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrijević et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: