Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis identifies emotional regulation and orofacial dysfunction as potential risk indicators for dyslexia.
Background/Objectives: Dyslexia and dysgraphia are common childhood neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by persistent reading and writing difficulties, despite normal intelligence and access to education. While typically described as cognitive–linguistic deficits, emerging research suggests potential links to orofacial dysfunction and emotional regulation issues. This study examines associations between stomatognathic anomalies, emotional dysregulation, and early indicators of dyslexia-dysgraphia risk in preschool children, aiming to strengthen early screening and intervention strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional case–control study included 689 Romanian children aged 5–7 from 11 kindergartens. Screening involved the ACTIV-BURLEA psychometric battery to evaluate language, motor, and cognitive abilities. Clinical assessments targeted dental arch form, occlusal balance, and tongue and lip function. Emotional regulation was evaluated using a standardized child behavior scale. Thirty-two children were identified as at risk for dyslexia-dysgraphia and followed longitudinally, and then compared to matched controls. Statistical analysis employed chi-square tests, Pearson correlations, t-tests, and logistic regression. Results: At follow-up, 74.19% of at-risk children received confirmed diagnoses. Tongue dysfunction (TD) (OR = 4.81, p = 0.06) and emotional dysregulation (ED) (OR = 3.94, p = 0.09) emerged as key risk indicators, though not statistically significant. Tongue dysfunction (TD) correlated with school avoidance (r = 0.76, p < 0.01), while occlusal anomalies (OAs) correlated with emotional distress (ED) (r = 0.64, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The findings suggest that early dyslexia-dysgraphia risk involves orofacial and emotional components. Tongue dysfunction (TD), occlusal disturbances (OA), and emotional dysregulation (ED) may offer important clinical markers. Integrating dental and emotional assessments into preschool screening may improve early identification and enable personalized intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burlea et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: