Quasi-experimental analysis reveals the Think Pair Share approach does not significantly improve student engagement in Islamic Education, suggesting need for contextual alignment.
General Background: Student engagement is critical in ensuring effective learning outcomes, particularly in cooperative learning settings. Specific Background: The Think Pair Share (TPS) strategy has been recognized for promoting active participation, especially in student-centered pedagogies. Knowledge Gap: However, limited empirical studies have explored the application of TPS within the context of Islamic Education (IE), which is often delivered through normative, didactic methods. Aims: This study investigates the effectiveness of the TPS strategy in enhancing students’ learning activeness in IE classes at SMP Negeri 16 Bandar Lampung. Results: Employing a quasi-experimental design, the study found no statistically significant difference between the TPS and control groups in learning activeness (Sig. 2-tailed = 0.104, > 0.05). Novelty: The research highlights contextual limitations—including students' unfamiliarity with interactive models, the brief duration of the intervention, and the normative character of IE content—as possible inhibitors to TPS effectiveness. Implications: Although the TPS model did not yield statistically significant results in this case, it remains a valuable pedagogical tool for fostering collaboration and engagement. Future studies should consider prolonged implementation and strategic alignment between TPS elements and the characteristics of IE content to optimize impact. Highlights: TPS promotes collaboration but may not suit all subject contexts. Short intervention and lack of familiarity limit its impact. Alignment with content and extended use is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pajri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: