Research demonstrates critical factors influencing urban street alfresco spaces in Shanghai, suggesting safety and accessibility are key elements for improvement.
This study develops a comprehensive evaluation framework for urban street alfresco spaces by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Entropy Weight Method. Daxue Road in Shanghai is selected as a representative case to analyze key factors influencing urban street alfresco spaces, which refer to commercially utilized outdoor extensions of building facades along streets, typically in the form of semi-open, publicly accessible areas used for dining, vending, seating, or temporary retail activities. These spaces are typically operated by adjacent businesses or regulated by local policies, and they integrate pedestrian circulation, commercial vibrancy, and spatial adaptability. They serve as critical urban interfaces that foster street-level vibrancy, social interaction, and public life. The evaluation system covers five dimensions: Cognizability, Accessibility, Participation, Emotional Design, and Spatial Diversity. The methodological innovation lies in integrating subjective weights derived from AHP with objective weights obtained through entropy calculations, which enhances the scientific rigor and neutrality of the evaluation. The results show that traffic safety (weight = 0.0644) and locational attributes of streets (weight = 0.0574) are the most influential factors affecting user perception. Compared to previous studies that often prioritize visual aesthetics or commercial density, this study underscores the significance of traffic-related factors, indicating a shift in user preferences in high-density urban environments. The findings provide practical guidance for urban design and policy to improve the quality, safety, and vitality of street-level public spaces in high-density cities. This research contributes to the theoretical foundation for sustainable and human-oriented street regeneration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: