Digital solution improves recovery adherence and patient satisfaction in colorectal cancer patients, suggesting better postoperative outcomes.
Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in the Western world in cancer incidence and second as the cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite advances in perioperative care, minimizing postoperative morbidity is crucial in clinical practice. Digitalization of the healthcare process plays a key role in genuinely and effectively engaging patients. Our aim was to evaluate a digital solution for remote monitoring of patients with CRC, from surgery indication to postoperative discharge. Methods: We developed a digital solution using Value Stream Mapping (VSM) to identify patient care flow and Lean Sigma for optimization and efficiency. We incorporated the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)/RICA pentamodal recommendations to create a program with an individualized schedule for each patient, who received tailored educational, medical, and practical information at every stage of the process. Results: A total of 193 patients used the digital solution, with >75% adhering to ERAS recommendations. The median length of hospital stay was 5 days, with low adherence leading to 3.4 (p = 0.628) or 3.27 (p = 0.642) extra days in the hospital compared to patients with intermediate and high adherence, respectively. The mean comprehensive complication index (CCI) was 9.1/100, which was higher in patients with low adherence (15) versus intermediate (8.17; p = 0.027) and high (7.42; p = 0.011) adherence. An increase in self-perception of quality of life by 9.2% was identified at the end of the process compared to the outcome at the beginning (p = 0.09), and 80% rated their overall satisfaction with the care process as 8 or higher out of 10. Conclusions: The digital solution facilitates the monitoring of CRC care and implementation and adherence to ERAS recommendations, improving patient engagement and satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaparro-Mirete et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: