Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 17, 2025International Journal of Qualitative MethodsOpen Access

Rejecting the Label of “Vulnerable Subjects:” How Rethinking Ethical Guidelines for Research With Participants With Physical Disabilities Can Lead to Better Research

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MHMarty HeathUniversity of Illinois Chicago

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

This work demonstrates that reframing the label 'vulnerable' in research can improve the inclusion of participants with physical disabilities, suggesting new ethical guidelines.

Key Points

  • Changing the label 'vulnerable' may enhance participant inclusion, and improve research outcomes on disability topics.
  • The research emphasizes that ethical considerations must be tailored to diverse needs, rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach.
  • A focus on accessibility throughout research strategies is crucial to include participants with physical disabilities effectively.
  • Encouraging ethical representation can help dismantle stereotypes and promote justice for individuals with physical disabilities.

Cite This Study

Marty Heath (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36dec0a429f7973331ae3https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251368862
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Toward Access Justice in the Academy: Centring Episodic Disability to Revision Research Methodologies2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Making Qualitative Research Inclusive: Methodological Insights in Disability Research2022 · 44 citations
  3. 3Models of disability1997 · 301 citations
  4. 4The ethics of doing research with vulnerable populations2017 · 59 citations