This analysis identifies inefficiencies in caregiving, highlighting government roles and proposing cooperative game-theoretic models.
As global populations age rapidly, caregiving for the elderly has emerged as a critical challenge, particularly due to the fragmented roles played by families, governments, and institutions. This paper reconceptualizes caregiving as a strategic decision-making process rather than a purely emotional or moral undertaking. Through a thematic synthesis of 16 game-theoretic empirical studies, it identifies systemic inefficiencies rooted in coordination failures, free-riding behaviour, and asymmetrical burdens—particularly along gender and cultural lines. The study divides its literature analysis into two domains: intra-family role allocation and the influence of governmental and institutional policy. It finds that caregiving within families often functions as a non-cooperative public goods game, while government interventions are frequently either overly generalized or narrowly targeted, leading to suboptimal support. To address these strategic mismatches, the paper proposes a cooperative game-theoretic model integrating Lagrangian optimization for efficiency with Shapley Value allocation for fairness. This model formalizes caregiving as a shared burden between families, institutions, and governments, and identifies optimal strategies for cost-sharing and stable cooperation. The paper thus contributes a new conceptual and prescriptive framework to optimize caregiving systems under growing demographic and economic pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohan Monga (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: