Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article presents principles for formal logic, emphasizing plausible reasoning without probabilities, highlighting crucial examples.
Plausible reasoning concerns situations that have an inherent lack of precision, which is not quantified; that is, there are no degrees or levels of precision, and hence no use of numbers like probabilities. A hopefully comprehensive set of principles that clarifies what it means for a formal logic to do plausible reasoning is presented. Several important plausible-reasoning examples that guide the development of some of the principles are also given. Versions of these principles and examples have appeared in Billington (2017) and chapter 4 of Billington (2019). Each principle in this article is the same as, or an improvement on, the corresponding principle in chapter 4 of Billington (2019); for a detailed comparison, see the Appendix. A propositional plausible logic that satisfies all these principles appears in Billington (2017, 2019). This shows that all the principles together are consistent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David P. Billington (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: