Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals differences in the term bodhisattva across manuscripts, indicating evolving concepts of enlightenment in Buddhism.
In his Glossary of Dharmarakṣa’s Translation of the Lotus Sutra [Saddharmapuṇḍarīka], Seishi Karashima describes a 開士 (kāi-shì) as “a man, who is on the way to enlightenment”. The term 開士 (kāi-shì) is generally accepted to be an older translation of 菩薩 (pú sà; Bodhisattva). The question remains as to why the words 開士 and 菩薩 are distinguished in Dharmarakṣa’s version, even though both meanings are Bodhisattva. How was a Bodhisattva understood when Dharmarakṣa made his translation in 286 CE? In this study, I will present the characteristics associated with these usages, and examine the differences between Sanskrit manuscripts (Central Asian manuscript SI P/5 and Gilgit manuscript No. 44 in Delhi collection) and manuscripts in other languages, such as Tibetan. Then, I will present my hypothesis that the root of the difference is related to the rendering of Bodhi-saTTva as Bodhi-saTvan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Youngsil Lee (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: