Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trials show shorter single-session interventions reduce loneliness in online workers, suggesting length may not determine efficacy.
Online, self-guided single-session interventions (SSIs), which provide a complete mental-health intervention in one brief experience, promise to increase global access to evidence-based support. One way to expand current SSIs’ reach is to shorten them, but doing so could also compromise their effectiveness. We conducted two randomized trials to test if shortening evidence-based SSIs reduces their efficacy among adult online workers facing mental-health struggles. In Study 1 ( N = 262), the 8-min Overcoming Loneliness SSI reduced loneliness over 8 weeks more than a 23-min version of it ( b = 2.64; d = 0.22, 95% confidence interval = [0.02, 0.41]; p = .03). In Study 2 ( N = 1,145), 15-min, 9-min, 5-min, and 3-min versions of the Action Brings Change SSI did not significantly differ in how much they affected depression 8 weeks later ( p s > .14). Our results suggest that longer digital SSIs are not necessarily more helpful than shorter ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaveladze et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: