Surveillance of drinking water quality shows low compliance in urban areas, highlighting risks and management needs.
Clean and safe drinking water is essential for public health. Despite substantial infrastructure investments, ensuring water safety remains a challenge in Bhutan. The objective of the study is to provide a nationwide assessment of drinking water quality from 2017 to 2024, covering 20 Dzongkhags samples from 31 urban (n = 20,982) and 242 rural (n = 14,361) surveillance sites. Data were retrieved from the ater Quality Monitoring Information System and analyzed for compliance and assessed compliance with Bhutan Drinking Water Quality Standards and WHO guidelines. Only 52.8% of urban samples met the microbial standard (0 CFU/100 mL), as the Eastern region showed the lowest compliance. Residual chlorine compliance was critically low (11.9%), indicating inadequate disinfection. While turbidity met Bhutan's standard (95.2%), only 67.3% complied with WHO's health-based guideline (1 NTU). Other parameters, such as pH and conductivity, showed high compliance (>96%). Rural systems, largely untreated, showed better microbial compliance (70.1%), though methodological differences limit a direct comparison. Health risk classification showed seasonal deterioration in safety, particularly during the monsoon in urban and rural areas. The study recommends shifting to risk-based water safety management, including upgrading treatment capacity, standardizing testing methodology, and implementing and auditing water safety plans to meet Bhutan's Five-Year Plan targets and Sustainable Development Goal 6.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chophel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: