Descriptive survey assesses multiagency structures in conflict management, highlighting collaboration and leadership for effectiveness.
This study assesses the effectiveness of the multiagency structures for conflict management in Laikipia County, Kenya. It seeks to provide an understanding of the context and importance of multiagency approaches to conflict management. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the multiagency structures employed for conflict management in Laikipia County and assess the effectiveness of multiagency structures for conflict management in Laikipia County. The study utilises a descriptive survey research design. Primary data was collected in Laikipia West Sub-County from 223 respondents, 17 FGD participants, and 13 key informants using questionnaires, FGD guides, and interview guides, respectively. First, the study established that conflict in Laikipia West Sub-County is an outcome of complex and intersecting factors that require a multiagency intervention approach. Second, implementing a multiagency approach has positively affected conflict management in Laikipia West Sub-County since it onboards collaboration, acceptability, and resource mobilisation. Lastly, strong leadership, inclusivity, and accountability enhance multi-agency interventions and the successes thereof. The study concludes that while multiagency approaches can effectively manage conflicts, successful implementation requires meticulous planning and execution, tailored to the specific dynamics of the conflict landscape. The study recommends continued focus on participatory approaches, establishing formal dialogue platforms, prioritising strong leadership and inclusivity, and involving stakeholders in conflict management in Laikipia County.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cosmas Ekwom Kamais (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: