Descriptive survey evaluates multiagency coordination and leadership effectiveness in emergency response.
Effective multiagency coordination is important for timely emergency response to minimise loss of lives and property damage. During emergencies, multiple agencies, such as the fire department, paramedics, police, government agencies, and nongovernmental organisations often respond. Without clear leadership and a well-defined command structure, there is the risk of duplication of roles, wastage of resources, confusion, and loss of lives. The study evaluates the leadership and command structures in multiagency coordination during emergency response in Nairobi County, Kenya. It focuses on how leadership adaptability, accountability, and decision-making processes affect the efficacy of multiagency coordination during emergency response. It uses a descriptive survey research design, questionnaires, and key informant interviews to collect data from key emergency response agencies in Nairobi County, Kenya. A sample of 316 respondents was selected through purposive and simple random sampling techniques. The findings show that 72.1% of respondents agree that leaders demonstrate accountability and transparency. However, there are challenges in adapting to rapidly changing emergencies, with political interference occasionally interfering with the established command structures. Further, 67.5% of respondents agree that decision-making processes are generally transparent, but inconsistencies arise when individuals bypass the Incident Command System (ICS). The study recommends enhancing the enforcement of the ICS to ensure streamlined decision-making, adaptation, and accountability through targeted training. This will result in more efficient multiagency coordination and timely emergency response in Nairobi County, Kenya, and beyond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Njalale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: