Systematic review finds diffusion-weighted MRI may improve diagnostic accuracy for benign and malignant thyroid nodules, suggesting better imaging techniques.
Background: Thyroid nodules are highly prevalent, affecting up to 75% of the population, yet most are benign. The limited specificity of ultrasound-based workup leads to substantial overdiagnosis and overtreatment, underscoring the need for improved imaging-based classification. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), quantified via the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), has emerged as a promising imaging biomarker. This meta-analysis updates pooled diagnostic performance metrics and systematically evaluates which DWI acquisition techniques, imaging parameters, and combinations with other MRI modalities are most promising for clinical translation. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest were systematically searched. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using bivariate random-effects models. The effects of b-value, magnetic field strength, echo time, and diffusion model on diagnostic accuracy and ADC values were examined through subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Results: Forty-six studies (3003 nodules) were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81–0.86) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85–0.90), with an AUC of 0.912. Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging showed no added value over the mono-exponential model. For the mono-exponential model, a negative association between b-values and reported ADCs was observed, whereas no association was found between b-values and diagnostic accuracy. Magnetic field strength and echo time did not affect ADCs. Combining DWI with morphological imaging showed the potential to further enhance diagnostic performance. Conclusions: DWI holds strong potential to improve the diagnostic workup of thyroid nodules. Technical standardization, particularly of key acquisition parameters, should be pursued to enable clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: