Analysis explores legal dilemmas in nuclear pollution and suggests innovations for dispute resolution mechanisms.
In the context of increasingly close international exchanges and cooperation, the concept of protecting the marine environment and rights has become increasingly deeply rooted in people's minds. Based on the Fukushima nuclear wastewater discharge incident, the concept of the marine community and even the human community as a whole has gradually become a topic of concern and discussion. This article uses the method of literature research and legal text analysis to deeply explore the legal dilemmas and institutional innovations in nuclear pollution control under the framework of international maritime law. This study, based on the background of the times and legal background, proposes corresponding innovative solutions and breakthrough viewpoints for the nuclear pollution control mechanism, post-event dispute resolution mechanism, and judicial enforcement mechanism. It optimizes and supplements the determination of state responsibility and the regulation of existing normative legal documents and also analyzes and proposes innovations for the dispute resolution mechanisms internationally. Focusing on pre-emptive prevention and post-event measures, it further understands and supplements nuclear pollution control. This is done to solve the marine rights protection issues caused by marine environmental protection in the international community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ChingLing Ding (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: