This analysis reveals stark efficiency contrasts in innovation-driven labor markets, suggesting approaches for optimizing outcomes.
Innovation-driven labor markets play a pivotal role in economic development, yet significant disparities exist in how efficiently countries transform innovation inputs into labor market outcomes. This study addresses the critical gap in benchmarking multi-stage innovation efficiency by developing an integrated framework combining Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Super Slack-Based Measure (Super-SBM) for static efficiency evaluation and the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) for dynamic productivity decomposition, enhanced with cooperative game theory for robustness testing. Focusing on the top 20 innovative economies over a 5-year period, we analyze key inputs (Innovation Index, GDP, trade openness) and outputs (labor force, unemployment rates), revealing stark efficiency contrasts: China, Luxembourg, and the U.S. demonstrate optimal performance (mean scores > 1.9), while Singapore and the Netherlands show significant underutilization (scores < 0.4). Our results identify a critical productivity shift period (average MPI = 1.325) driven primarily by technological advancements. This study contributes a replicable, data-driven model for cross-domain efficiency assessment and provides empirical evidence for policymakers to optimize innovation-labor market conversion. The methodological framework offers scalable applications for future research in computational economics and productivity analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: