Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychometric analysis shows that the Parent-Child Gaslighting Questionnaire reliably measures attitudes towards child maltreatment, suggesting its potential utility.
Purpose: To address child maltreatment, it is necessary to be able to reliably and accuratelyassess its many forms. The purpose of the present project was to evaluate a tool for assessing oneparticular form: parent-child gaslighting. We tested the psychometric properties of a Parent-Child Gaslighting Questionnaire (PCGQ), a 10-item measure assessing one’s belief that it isacceptable to make one’s children doubt their perceptions, judgements, and memories. Method:We administered the PCGQ, as well as eight measures assessing theoretically relevantconstructs, to a census-matched sample of US parents (NTime1 = 494; NTime2 = 426). Results: Thefindings indicate that the PCGQ is fairly unidimensional, as indexed using dynamic fit indexthresholds; internally consistent, as indexed by Cronbach’s alpha (α = .86); dependable, asindexed by a test-retest correlation across two weeks (r = .71); and construct valid, as indexed byits association with eight theoretically relevant variables, including acceptance of child emotionalabuse (r = .73), physical sadism (r = .61), and positive views towards the use corporalpunishment (r = .55). Conclusion: Taken together, the present results indicate that the PCGQ isa promising measure of attitudes towards parent-child gaslighting, although we encourage futurework to further investigate its psychometric properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kay et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: