Retrospective analysis of referral patterns in a neuro-ophthalmology clinic in Bogota, revealing frequent misdiagnoses and long wait times.
Background: There is a global shortage of neuro-ophthalmologists, driven by an aging workforce and declining interest among residents. Emerging data indicate that this supply-demand mismatch results in prolonged patient wait times, leading to evaluation by additional physicians, delayed/incorrect diagnosis, and postponed therapy. However, data on referral patterns are primarily from resource-rich countries. This study examines referral patterns for a neuro-ophthalmology clinic in Bogota, Colombia. Methods: A retrospective chart review analyzed patients referred to the clinic between July 2020 and July 2021. Data included demographics, time from symptom onset to neuro-ophthalmology appointment (NOA), referral-to-NOA time, initial specialty consulted, number of providers seen before NOA, diagnostic tests performed, and diagnoses at referral vs after NOA. Results: Among 535 patients (62.1% female), the median wait from symptom onset to NOA was 365 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 60–500) and 30 days ([IQR: 10–45]) from referral to NOA. Most patients (80.2%) first saw an ophthalmologist, with a mean of 1.1 providers seen before NOA. Common diagnostic tests before NOA included brain MRIs (28.6%), posterior segment optical coherence tomography (24.3%), and visual fields (22.8%). Three hundred twenty-six (63.9%) of patients were either partially or completely misdiagnosed before NOA. Time from symptom onset to NOA was a predictor for fully correct diagnosis by referring provider ( P < 0.01), with a shorter time corresponding to a greater likelihood of partially correct diagnosis. Conclusions: Referral delays are frequent, and misdiagnoses before neuro-ophthalmology consultations are common. Enhancing timely access to NOA could significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary utilization of health care resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheth et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: