Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis shows an increased mortality risk with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women, indicating potential discrepancies with randomized trial outcomes.
Benchmarking an observational analysis against a randomized trial increases our confidence in the use of observational data for causal inference. The Breast International Group (BIG 1-98) randomized trial compared the effect of letrozole and tamoxifen on the risk of death in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. We designed a target trial that aimed to ask the same question as the one asked in BIG 1-98 and emulated it in Swedish registry data. The primary results from our observational analysis showed an increased risk of death in those who initiated aromatase inhibitors compared with tamoxifen [5-year risk difference = 2.5% (95% CI, 0.2%–4.6%)], which was discordant to the results from BIG 1-98. However, estimates were more closely aligned when our observational analysis was restricted to non-users of opioids or antidepressants [risk difference = -0.9 (95% CI, -4.2–2.0)]. In conclusion, when benchmarking an observational analysis against a trial, alignment of eligibility criteria with the index trial is not always sufficient and further study population restrictions may be required to address unmeasured confounding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐kassab‐Córdova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: