This comparative analysis demonstrates FIA-MS detects coffee adulteration effectively, suggesting a faster and more sustainable alternative to LC-MS.
Coffee adulteration is a growing concern in the food industry due to economic and quality implications. This study evaluates a rapid, non-targeted fingerprinting method based on flow injection analysis–mass spectrometry (FIA-MS) for detecting common coffee adulterants. A total of 119 samples were analyzed, including 43 coffee samples and 76 samples of common coffee adulterants (16 chicory, 10 barley, and 50 flour samples). FIA-MS combined with chemometric analysis allowed for the classification of pure and adulterated coffee samples with over 95% accuracy. Compared to LC-MS, the FIA-MS method showed a similar performance while offering significantly faster analysis and lower solvent consumption, making it a practical and sustainable option for high-throughput screening. For PLS regression studies, calibration and prediction errors were consistently below 0.91% and 11.7%, respectively. Furthermore, the methodology was compared with a non-targeted LC-MS approach, showing an excellent performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Núñez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: