What type of study is this?

This is a Observational study (also classified as: Case Report).

August 18, 2025Open Access

The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Decision-Making in High-Stakes Environments

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Availability bias was most commonly reported among professionals in high-stakes environments, reducing decision accuracy significantly.
Decision accuracy decreased notably as cognitive biases like confirmation bias and anchoring bias were introduced, alongside increased decision-making time.
Quantitative design involved scenario-based tasks and surveys, revealing critical insights into first-hand experiences with cognitive biases across various sectors.
Observational data highlights the need for structured decision-making frameworks, emphasizing the importance of training to mitigate biases under pressure.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Quantitative analysis shows cognitive biases reduce decision accuracy in healthcare and finance, suggesting training may improve outcomes.

Begum et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Quantitative analysis shows cognitive biases reduce decision accuracy in healthcare and finance, suggesting training may improve outcomes.