Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 15, 2025Bulletin of Science and PracticeOpen Access

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness and Frequency of Complications in the Use of the "Flap Within a Flap" Technique and Traditional Techniques of Reconstruction with Skin Fascial Flaps of the Forearm

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AZA. ZhoroevSTS. TukeshovNTN. Temirov

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative analysis reveals the flap within a flap technique outperforms traditional skin flaps, suggesting improved outcomes in aesthetics and rehabilitation.

Key Points

  • The flap within a flap technique outperformed traditional methods in all assessment criteria, enhancing both aesthetics and function.
  • Flap survival rates and complication rates showed significant improvements, with better overall results for the innovative technique.
  • The analysis was conducted on data from 161 patients undergoing different methods for skin and soft tissue reconstruction.
  • This innovative approach may represent a promising alternative in reconstructive surgery, indicating potential for broader application.

Cite This Study

Zhoroev et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af55d8ad7bf08b1eadc8e3https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/117/36
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Use of Vascularized Radial Flap by the "Flap in Flap" Method in Reconstruction for Complex and Extensive Defects of the skin and Soft Tissues of the Hand2025
  2. 2Systematic review: Cutaneous flaps2025
  3. 3Perforator flaps in soft tissue reconstruction: clinical outcomes in reconstructive plastic surgery2025
  4. 4Perforator-based local flaps for cutaneous facial reconstruction2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Outcomes of flap reconstruction techniques in abdominal wall defects following oncologic resections2024