Survey reveals impacts of institutional characteristics on perceptions of assessment, suggesting new practices.
Researchers surveyed registrants of the Student Affairs Assessment Leaders Listserv. Quantitatively, we used a positivist approach to analyze data with inferential statistics and a relatively novel realist approach to analyze data with observation oriented modeling. Qualitatively, open-ended items were subjected to qualitative content analysis and then generalized to a legitimacy framework. Three broad categories of respondents’ institutions impacted respondents’ strength of agreement: institutional type, institutional designation, and accreditor. Recommendations for practice, research, and implications were provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: