This article proposes a framework for evaluating business viability in economic policy, highlighting scalability and resource availability.
In both business management practice and academic literature, the primary focus has traditionally been on enhancing the efficiency of business operations: process optimization, cost management, human capital development, innovation implementation, and similar efforts. However, a more fundamental issue has received comparatively less attention: whether the right business was chosen in the first place and what criteria should be considered to avoid selecting the wrong type of business.In this context, there is a need to rethink priorities and tools—not only regarding how to do things right (i.e., improving business efficiency), but, more importantly, whether we are doing the right things (i.e., engaging in the right type of business). Even perfect management in an unpromising business sector cannot ensure long-term success—unlike initially imperfect operations in a high-potential field, where process improvements can be introduced progressively over time.A similar logic can be applied to the realm of public governance and economic/industrial policy. Traditionally, state economic policy has focused on improving the general conditions for doing business: deregulation, tax relief, infrastructure development, and support for SMEs. While undeniably important, this approach often overlooks a strategically vital question: what specific economic activities should the state prioritize and promote? Are public resources being invested in sectors with the highest growth potential, returns, and productivity?This article proposes a heuristic framework for the strategic selection of a business or economic activity, based on three key criteria that determine its long-term attractiveness and viability:1. Increasing returns to scale,2. Scalability,3. Availability or accessibility of critical resources.The practical value of the proposed conceptual model lies in its universality—it can be applied across economic systems at various levels: individuals, households, firms, cities, countries, or broader regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viktor Halasiuk (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: