Multivariate modeling improves geographical traceability of PGI rape honey, suggesting enhanced integrity in origin verification.
Rationale Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) rape honey, recognized as a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) product in China, has faced significant challenges due to fraudulent mislabeling of its origins in the market. To ensure the authenticity of PGI honey products and uphold market integrity, it is crucial to develop a rapid, precise, and efficient geographical traceability technology. Methods A total of 208 honey samples were collected from QTP (n = 71) and 5 provinces in the southern region (SR, n = 137) of China. Stable isotope ratios (δ13C, δ15N, δ2H, and δ18O) of bulk honey, endogenous proteins, and saccharides (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) were measured. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to analyze regional differences among the variables. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were constructed based on stable isotopic data to discriminate honey sample origins. Results ANOVA indicated the geospatial differences (P < 0.05) in δ2H and δ18O of bulk honey, as well as all four ratios of honey protein, are significant between QTP and SR. LDA exhibited superior discrimination performance, with leave-one-out cross-validation accuracies of 87.3% for QTP, 89.1% for SR. Conclusion An integrated strategy combining stable isotope ratios analysis with multivariate modeling provides an accurate and effective verification method for geographical origin traceability of high-value honey from QTP. This approach provides a reliable tool to address the issue of fraudulent mislabeling of PGI rape honey. Highlights Stable isotopic signatures of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau rape honey were discussed. Bulk and component-specific isotopic ratios were informative geospatial indicators. Machine learning algorithms significantly enhanced honey origin discrimination. LDA accuracy for Qinghai-Tibet Plateau honey samples reached up to 87.3%. This strategy was developed to combat origin mislabeling and ensure food integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: