This analysis explores how Agamben's views on sovereignty and biopolitics reshape our understanding of law, suggesting complexities in political inclusion.
This paper explores Agamben’s philosophy of law, highlighting how his view on the topic relies on his reading of sovereignty and biopolitics. Indeed, within the fertile debate on Foucault’s biopower, Agamben provides an original and radical reading of the political inclusion of life. His exegesis embeds biopolitics within a theory of the very essence of Western tradition, and of its fundamental elements that are law and sovereignty. In the paper, deviations from a Foucauldian “orthodoxy” are traced back to the Italian philosopher’s fascination with Heidegger, Benjamin, and Kafka. Hence, Agamben develops an unedited method and positive political proposal. Last, this paper exhibits some shortcomings of his method, as an ontologizing approach to politics could obliterate, rather than clarify, the manifold historical manifestations of power and make ineffective the positive strategies against its violence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Letizia Konderak (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: