Operational case study reveals potential exhaust valve seat recession in reciprocating engines with UL94 use, indicating fuel adoption challenges.
The University of North Dakota (UND) adopted unleaded aviation fuel (UL94) for approximately a four-month period in the summer and early fall of 2023. The UL94 fuel was used in all reciprocating engine fleets based at the university's primary training airport, Grand Forks International Airport in North Dakota. During the operational implementation of UL94, the UND flew 46,600 flight hours, consuming 386,778 gallons of fuel across all fleets powered by Lycoming engines. After approximately two months of using UL94, operational reports and maintenance inspections began to indicate potential for exhaust valve seat recession (EVSR), although early indications were limited in number and could not be attributed to one specific causal relationship. After additional reports and inspections suggested a potential for a larger trend in EVSR and upon recommendation by both Lycoming and Swift Fuels, the university elected to switch back to 100 octane low-lead aviation fuel (100LL) on October 26, 2023. Post hoc analysis of engine exhaust valve tappet clearance measurements (an indication of EVSR) showed a statistically significant negative correlation to hours of UL94 usage (r = –0.52**, p < .001), suggesting EVSR developing with consumption of UL94. Additional analysis of time since overhaul, percent mix of 100LL, aircraft type, and several other metrics were performed as a part of this study. It should be noted that this publication and the UND's decision to switch to UL94 or back to 100LL were not funded by any private or government organization and should be considered an operational case study in adoption of unleaded aviation fuel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: