Review analyzes the role of virtual reality and artificial intelligence in cardiac surgery, highlighting their applications and implications for patient care.
Background: Virtual reality (VR) and artificial intelligence (AI) have had a profound impact on transforming cardiac interventions by enhancing procedure planning, execution, and medical education. Virtual reality enables healthcare professionals to refine their skills by practicing procedures in a simulated environment while also improving patient understanding of their conditions. Artificial intelligence enhances diagnosis and treatment planning by analyzing patient data, detecting patterns, and improving both accuracy and personalized care. The aim of this review was to analyze the anatomical scopes of both technologies in the context of cardiac interventions as well as the radiologic modalities involved in image reconstruction in virtual reality. Methodology: A literature search using the keywords "reviews," "artificial intelligence," "virtual reality," and "cardiac interventions" was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The search was limited to English-language systematic reviews; narrative reviews, individual research articles, editorials, and opinion papers were excluded. Results: An analysis of three reviews encompassing 71 studies revealed the applications of virtual reality (VR) and artificial intelligence (AI) in cardiac surgery. VR training was most frequently applied to mitral valve repair, while VR planning was most common for conotruncal anomalies. AI-driven decision support was most prevalent in heart transplantation. Conclusion: This article highlights the established roles of virtual reality and artificial intelligence in cardiac care, encompassing surgical training, procedural planning, risk assessment, and outcome prediction. However, current VR training methods often rely on time-consuming and expensive imaging techniques like CMR and CT angiography. Within cardiology, AI-driven decision-making is most prominent in heart transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AbdelMassih et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: