Key result
Virtual reality and artificial intelligence offer new possibilities for planning and guiding cardiovascular interventions, though these techniques require intensive validation.
This commentary highlights the potential and current limitations of virtual reality and artificial intelligence in planning and guiding cardiovascular interventions, emphasizing the need for rigorous validation before routine clinical use.
Improvementsin medical imaging and a steady increase in computing power are leading to new possibilities in the field of cardiovascular interventions. Interventions can be planned in advance in greater detail, even to the point of simulating procedures. Nevertheless, all techniques are at an early stage of development. It is of utmost importance that tools, especially if they can be used as decision support are intensively validated and their accuracy is demonstrated. In our commentary, we summarize current techniques for impprovements in planning and guiding of procedures, but also critically discuss the downsides of these techniques. Following the work of Kenichi and colleagues, we also discuss necessary steps in advancing new tools and techniques, particularly as they are used in routine clinical practice. We also discuss the role of artificial intelligence, which could play a crucial role in this context in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sündermann et al. (2022) conducted an editorial in Cardiovascular interventions. Virtual reality was evaluated. Virtual reality and artificial intelligence offer new possibilities for planning and guiding cardiovascular interventions, though these techniques require intensive validation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: