Digital model enhances operational efficiency in complex passenger transport systems, indicating resilience under uncertainty.
The article presents original algorithms for digitizing resource distribution processes in complex passenger transport systems (PTS). The study aims to develop a universal digital model capable of adapting to conditions where key system parameters are derived from generalized relationships, and their parameterization remains incomplete. The proposed structure of the resource distribution (RD) system accounts for PTS dynamics, including uncertainties related to demand fluctuations, infrastructure constraints, and variability in operational scenarios. The RD-system model is adaptable to three typical research cases inherent to PTS. Each case is implemented through a unified methodological approach: forming morphological matrices for scenario selection based on evaluative functionals. These matrices integrate efficiency criteria, such as minimizing time and resource costs, enabling context-specific management adjustments. The algorithms utilize real-time data on system metrics — passenger flow, transport load, and resource availability — ensuring accuracy and relevance in calculations. A mandatory requirement for the RD-system is its three-tier hierarchical structure. At the first level, three indicator subsystems are defined, each divided into three strata (basic, derived, and integrated metrics). For example, the “Operational Efficiency” subsystem includes strata for transport travel time, route frequency, and passenger satisfaction levels. This structure allows for task decomposition, synchronization of heterogeneous data, and the generation of comprehensive solutions. The developed algorithms and RD-system structure can be integrated into intelligent transport management platforms, enhancing the flexibility and resilience of PTS under uncertainty. The results are particularly relevant for cities with high passenger flow dynamics and limited resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halturin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: