Meta-synthesis explores advance care planning experiences in chronic heart failure, revealing barriers and personalized strategies for improvement.
Background Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a progressive life‐limiting condition that necessitates early implementation of advance care planning (ACP). However, patients and caregivers encounter emotional, informational, and cultural barriers to effective ACP engagement. This meta‐synthesis consolidates qualitative evidence to deepen our understanding of ACP practices in CHF care. Aims This study aimed to explore experiences of CHF patients and their caregivers in ACP, which is defined as a proactive decision‐making process to establish future treatment plans based on patients' values. The study also aimed to identify barriers and facilitators influencing ACP decisions and assess the impact of flexible, personalized ACP approaches on care quality. Methods Using qualitative meta‐synthesis, we analyzed 10 qualitative studies on CHF patients' and caregivers' ACP experiences. Data were thematically synthesized to identify emotional, relational, and practical factors that influence engagement in ACP. Results Three themes emerged: (1) heart failure patients and caregivers face difficulties in ACP (difficulties from patients, difficulties from the family, and difficulties from the society), (2) multidimensional drivers and impacts of ACP (advance care planning drivers, acceptance and implementation of ACP, emotions and effects of ACP), (3) flexible, personalized ACP delivers tangible benefits (timing and effectiveness of ACP discussions, patients and caregivers have personalized needs for ACP, and patients and caregivers affirm ACP benefits). Linking Evidence to Action ACP plays a critical role in improving end‐of‐life care quality and reducing emotional and decision‐making burdens on caregivers. Flexible and personalized ACP strategies supported by trained healthcare professionals more effectively meet the unique needs of patients and families. To overcome persistent barriers and promote broader ACP adoption, healthcare systems should prioritize provider communication training, ACP education, and support systems tailored to diverse cultural contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: