Assessment reveals translucency and masking ability of a single-shade opaque composite resin in dental applications, suggesting optimal thickness for effective coverage.
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the translucency and masking ability of a single-shade opaque composite resin with those of conventional opaque-shade composite resins of varying thicknesses. Three types of composite resin specimens, Omnichroma Blocker, Filtek Z350 XT A2D, and Gradia Direct Anterior AO2, were fabricated with a diameter of 8.0 mm and thicknesses of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0 mm. Three background plates were tested: a white tile, a black tile, and a C4-shade porcelain plate. The CIE L*a*b* values of the resin specimens on each background and in their inherent color were measured using a spectrophotometer, and the translucency parameter (TP) and color difference (ΔE*ab) were calculated. In all groups, TP and ΔE*ab values decreased with increasing specimen thickness. The black background was masked at a thickness of 1.5 mm or more, while the C4-shade porcelain background was masked at all tested thicknesses. Within the limitations of this study, a minimum thickness of 1.5 mm is recommended to mask intraoral darkness, and a thickness of 0.5 mm or greater is recommended to mask stained or discolored tooth structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: