Finite element analysis reveals factors affecting load-displacement characteristics in diaphragm springs, suggesting design improvements.
Diaphragm springs, as critical components in commercial vehicle clutch assemblies, directly determine the clutch’s working performance. The design of diaphragm springs, which possess a distinct symmetrical structure that underpins their mechanical behavior, centers on obtaining the large-end nonlinear load–displacement curve—a typical large deformation-induced nonlinear problem. Traditional design relies on the A-L formula, but studies show finite element analysis (FEA) yields results closer to actual measurements. This study established an FEA model of the diaphragm spring’s disc spring (excluding separation fingers) and validated its correctness by comparing it with the A-L formula. Then, using FEA on models with separation fingers, it analyzed factors influencing the large-end load–displacement characteristics. Leveraging the inherent symmetry of the diaphragm spring structure, particularly the symmetrical distribution of separation fingers, the analysis process efficiently captures uniform mechanical responses during deformation, while this symmetric arrangement also ensures balanced load distribution during clutch operation, a critical factor for stabilizing the load–displacement curve. Results indicate the separation finger root is a key factor, with larger root holes, square holes (compared to circular ones), and more separation fingers reducing stiffness to effectively adjust the curve; in contrast, the tip and length of separation fingers have little impact, making the latter unsuitable for design adjustments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: