This realist analysis addresses the boundary problem in democratic legitimacy, suggesting clarity in defining the demos and legitimacy.
Abizadeh has argued that when democratic theory defines the people who comprise a demos, the character of that theory is self-referential because the democratic principle of legitimacy invokes the same people over whom democratic rule is exercised. On this view, the legitimate outcome of a decision is simultaneously its precondition. This challenge to democratic legitimacy is known as the legitimate boundary problem. In this realist reply informed by Bernard Williams, I argue that Abizadeh’s position renders democratic legitimation an undesirably open-ended question and that democratic legitimacy is satisfied internally, with reference only to the state’s citizens as its demos.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judith Rodin (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: