Observational analysis reveals a 8% occurrence of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in neurosurgical patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy, indicating the need for better classification.
Background . Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) are common in pharmacoresistant epilepsy (PRE), especially in neurosurgical patients. Objective . To assess the epidemiology and classify variants of PNES in neurosurgical patients with PRE. Design and Methods . A single-centre uncontrolled open observational study was conducted (2017–2023) at Polenov Neurosurgical Institute within the framework of state assignment No. 123021000127-7. An epidemiological analysis was performed and a classification of PNES was developed. The study was approved by the LEC (protocol No.: 2304-22 of 18/04/2022). Descriptive statistics were used (SPSS 29.0.10; p = 0.05). Results . The study included 369 neurosurgical patients with PRE (cohort 1); PNES were identified in 29 patients (cohort 2). The PNES rate was 8 %. Preoperative PNES occurred in 5.4 % of cohort 1 and 70 % of cohort 2; postoperative PNES — in 2.4 % and 30 %, respectively. The proposed PNES classification includes four variants: isolated PNES, PNES during epilepsy remission, comorbidity of seizures and PNES, and de novo PNES. Conclusion . Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures are reported in about one in thirteen neurosurgical patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. De novo psychogenic non-epileptic seizures as psychopathological complications after surgery occur in 2.8 % of patients with epilepsy. The classification of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures includes 4 variants of the combination with epilepsy. The practical applica tion of the data on the epidemiology of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in pharmacoresistant epilepsy will help to avoid irrational use of antiepileptic drugs and surgical treatment methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Одинцова et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: