Brain morphometry shows volumetric changes in thalamic nuclei among schizophrenia patients, indicating the impact of auditory verbal hallucinations.
Background: The thalamus, together with its associated nuclei and thalamocortical pathways, is crucial in understanding the neurobiological mechanisms underlying auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) in schizophrenia (SCZ). Purpose: The study investigates the role of thalamic nuclei in schizophrenia patients experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs). Methods: A total of 21 healthy controls (HC), 22 schizophrenia patients without auditory verbal hallucinations (SCZ_AVH−), and 22 schizophrenia patients with auditory verbal hallucinations (SCZ_AVH+), aged between 19 and 65 years, were recruited. They underwent MRI scans, and participants in the SCZ_AVH+ group completed the assessment of the severity of different dimensions of auditory hallucinations and delusions using the psychotic symptom rating scale (PSYRATS). High-resolution T1-weighted imaging was utilized to analyze the volumes of the thalamic nuclei. Results: The volumetric analysis of the thalamic nuclei indicated a significant reduction (t = 2.64, P = 0.03) in the right medial geniculate nucleus (MGN) volume in the SCZ_AVH+ group (0.08 ± 0.01 cm3) compared to the SCZ_AVH− group (0.09 ± 0.01 cm3). Also, the SCZ_AVH− group (0.03 ± 0 cm3) showed a significant increase (t = −2.73, P = 0.02) in right habenular nucleus (HN) volume compared to the HC group (0.02 ± 0 cm3). Significant correlations were observed between the volume of the left MGN and psychotic ratings (r= −0.5), as well as between the volume of the right HN and psychotic ratings (r= 0.56). Conclusion: The volumetric changes are observed in both SCZ_AVH− and SCZ_AVH+ groups, mainly in the thalamic nuclei. Structural deficits in the MGN may distinguish schizophrenia patients with AVHs from those without.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fahad H. Alhazmi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: