Review of machine learning methods for predicting ETo, demonstrating high accuracy in data-limited environments.
Reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) is a crucial component in calculating crop water requirements, and its accurate prediction is vital for effective agricultural water management and irrigation planning. Generally, the FAO Penman-Monteith 56 equation is recommended as the benchmark’s method for calculating Eto, but it requires extensive meteorological data—posing challenges in regions with sparse monitoring infrastructure. This review addresses a critical gap: the lack of systematic comparative analysis of machine learning (ML) methods for ETo estimation under data-limited conditions. We review 325 studies searched by Web of Science from 2001 to 2024, focusing on applications of machine learning models in ETo modeling and prediction. Then, this review evaluates these models regarding their characteristics, accuracy, and applicability, including artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), ensemble learning (EL), and deep learning (DL). Crucially, EL models demonstrate superior stability and cost-effectiveness, with typical performance metrics of R2 > 0.95 and RMSE ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 mm·d−1. Notably, DL methods achieve the highest accuracy under conditions of data scarcity. Using only temperature data, they attain competitive performance (R2 = 0.81, RMSE = 0.56 mm·d−1). Additionally, we further synthesize optimal input variables, performance metrics, and domain-specific implementation guidelines. In summary, this study provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of machine learning methods for ETo modeling, thereby offering valuable insights for researchers in the field of evapotranspiration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: