The analysis reveals noncovalent interactions in disiloxane derivatives and their complexes, highlighting molecular properties.
The supramolecular structure of the products of triflamidation of 1,1,3,3‐tetramethyl‐1,3‐divinyldisiloxane – 6‐iodo‐3‐(triflamidomethyl)‐4‐triflyl‐1,4,2,7‐oxazadisilepane 1 and 2,2,4,4‐tetramethyl‐6,8‐bis(triflyl)‐3‐oxa‐6,8‐ diaza‐2,4‐disilabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane 2 – is analyzed based on the x‐ray analysis and theoretical calculations in gas phase and in a polar medium (DMSO). In the crystal, it consists of infinite chains of the dimers formed by noncovalent bonds of the NH and CH groups with the SO 2 or SiOSi oxygen and CF 3 fluorine atoms. The calculated maximum positive and negative molecular electrostatic potentials (MEPs) of the monomers are consistent with the lengths of intra and intermolecular bonds in the dimers formed thereof. The NH∙∙∙O═S bonds in the dimers of 1 and 2 are “moderate” in strength (∼4 kcal/mol), the NH∙∙∙F, СH∙∙∙F, CH∙∙∙O═S or CH∙∙∙OSi are weak (1–3 kcal/mol). The interactions in the complexes of molecules 1 and 2 with proton and electron acceptors such as acetonitrile, pyrrole, or zinc chloride can be both cooperative and anticooperative (competitive) depending on their nature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chípanina et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: