Key result
LV/RV volume ratio on CMR accurately identifies significant aortic regurgitation with ~0.83 AUC.
Why the study?
Does the LV/RV ratio assessed by CMR accurately identify significant aortic regurgitation compared to conventional LV measures in patients with chronic AR?
Observational (n=258)
Yes
Does the LV/RV ratio assessed by CMR accurately identify significant aortic regurgitation compared to conventional LV measures in patients with chronic AR?
Effect estimate: r=0.67
p-value: p=<0.001
The LV/RV ratio assessed by CMR is a reliable, individualized marker of LV remodeling that accurately identifies significant chronic aortic regurgitation.
Background Left ventricular (LV) enlargement in chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) is commonly assessed using diameters and volumes. However, these measures are influenced by body size, sex, and age. The left-to-right ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio (LV/RV ratio), assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and known to remain close to 1 in healthy individuals, could provide a more individualized marker of LV remodeling in chronic AR. Methods and results This bi-center study included 258 patients with chronic AR (median age: 55 years, 18% women) who underwent echocardiography (Echo) and CMR. LV and RV volumes were measured from cine-CMR images. Associations between the LV/RV ratio, conventional LV measures, and significant AR, defined as grade 3-4 on Echo or Regurgitant fraction (AR-RegFrac) ≥ 33% on CMR, were analyzed using area under the curves (AUC) and logistic regression. The median LV/RV ratio was 1.5 [1.3-1.9], increased with AR severity (p<0.001), and correlated more strongly with AR-RegFrac (r=0.67, p<0.001) than conventional LV measures. The LV/RV ratio identified significant AR with good accuracy (Echo: AUC 0.77, CMR: AUC 0.83). A threshold of 1.5 provided balanced sensitivity and specificity (Se 71–84%, Sp 77–75%), while 1.8 ruled in significant AR with high specificity (Sp 91% for both modalities). The LV/RV ratio did not vary significantly by age or sex and showed consistent performance across subgroups. Conclusion The LV/RV ratio is a reliable and individualized marker of LV remodeling in chronic AR. These findings support its potential role in clinical assessment and further evaluation in outcome studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altes et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic aortic regurgitation (n=258). Left-to-right ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio (LV/RV ratio) vs. Conventional LV measures was evaluated on Significant AR (grade 3-4 on Echo or Regurgitant fraction ≥ 33% on CMR) (r=0.67, p=<0.001). The left-to-right ventricular volume ratio correlated strongly with regurgitant fraction (r=0.67, p<0.001) and accurately identified significant aortic regurgitation (CMR AUC 0.83).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: