Experimental analysis reveals output performance of a piezoelectric energy harvester in various bluff-body shapes, indicating flow field dynamics influence energy-conversion efficiency.
The output performance of wake-induced vibration piezoelectric energy harvesting is closely related to wake characteristics. We used tunnel tests and a two-way fluid–structure interaction method to reveal the influence mechanism of wake characteristics in an integrated double bluff-body piezoelectric energy harvester (PEH) by changing the interference column cross section. The vibration response, flow field, output performance, and energy-conversion efficiency were obtained in the wind speed range of 0–6 m/s. Results indicated that the vibration response and output performance of the device were outcomes of the combined effects of wind speed and bluff-body shape. When U < 3.2 m/s, the turbulence intensity of the wake was enhanced owing to the tip angle of the square column. Thus, the largest displacement and voltage were obtained in the square column. When U > 3.2 m/s, the large velocity gradient behind the cylinder makes it have the best overall performance. The energy-conversion efficiency of PEH initially increased and then decreased with increasing wind speed. The maximum efficiencies of the cylinder at 0.25 m/s were 62.5% and 116.7% higher than those of the square and triangular columns, respectively. When U > 1.5 m/s, the efficiency trend of the triangular column remained stable, whereas those of the cylindrical and square columns displayed an alternating trend. This study, employing a combined experimental and simulation approach, elucidated the electric energy generation patterns of the PEH under wake-induced vibration. It provides a novel energy solution for low-power marine monitoring. This not only lays the foundation for the large-scale application of such technologies but also may support broader marine observation networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: