Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed methods study shows knowledge gaps and poor practices in menstrual hygiene among 500 girls and women, indicating a need for culturally sensitive education and sustainable options.
Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is a public health issue, especially where resources are limited. This study used a mix of methods to look at the knowledge, practices, health outcomes, and social barriers related to menstruation. It involved 500 girls and women ages 12–40 from both rural and urban areas. The study found gaps in knowledge and practices. For instance, 45% of participants didn't know how often to change sanitary pads, and 53% had health problems like urinary or reproductive tract infections due to poor hygiene. Group discussions and interviews pointed to stigmas, distress at the start of menstruation, and lack of awareness about eco-friendly options. An educational program with visuals and myth-busting sessions led to better knowledge (84%), more openness (79%), and safer disposal practices (71%). The study shows that culturally sensitive education and promotion of sustainable products are key to improving menstrual health and empowering women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhardwaj et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: