This study introduces nature-building communities to improve urban ecosystems, indicating a shift toward grassroots governance.
Urban renaturing efforts increasingly emphasize the role of collaborative governance in managing nature-based solutions (NbS). However, existing frameworks often prioritize institutional perspectives and top-down participation, overlooking the early-stage design needs of grassroots initiatives. This study introduces the concept of Nature-Building Communities (NbCs)—voluntary, community-driven governance networks focused on creating and maintaining urban ecosystems. Using a design science research approach, we synthesize insights from socio-ecological systems, adaptive co-management, platform design, and energy communities to develop a practical design framework that supports the self-organization of NbCs. The framework identifies core design problems across five dimensions: scope, architecture, value logic, governance, and strategy. It is validated through a case study in Hungary, where a school-based NbC was initiated as part of an EU-funded greening intervention. Our findings provide actionable guidance for grassroots actors, intermediaries, and policymakers aiming to support autonomous community participation in the co-governance of urban NbS. This approach shifts the emphasis from institutional “reach down” to grassroots “reach up,” enabling more just and effective urban renaturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bukovszki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: